Saturday, June 15, 2013

Sedge ID with Scientist Andrew Hipp

Had the very fortunate opportunity to head out into the field with one of the more respected Biologists in the Midwest region earlier this week.  Andrew Hipp is the senior scientist in plant systematics over at the Morton Arboretum in Lisle, IL.  He came out to the prairie to help ID some Carex Sp.  One biologist from the Cook County Forest Preserve said, "If Andrew can't ID the sedge, I don't know who else could."

Below are some examples of how closely related Sedges can be:

 Carex normalis (via: http://michiganflora.net)
 Carex bebbii (via: http://michiganflora.net)
Carex tenera (via: http://michiganflora.net)
Carex cristatella (via: http://michiganflora.net)

Sedge species are usually a good indicator of a wetland, or saturated soil.  They represent the cyperaceae family which holds a large variety of species.  Sedges usually have triangular stems, and this is probably the easiest ID attribute.  

Andrew was one of the collaborator's at the Field Museum's herbarium downtown Chicago.  They have a fantastic article (for the Chicago region) online found here:  http://fm2.fieldmuseum.org/plantguides/guide_pdfs/384.pdf. 

They list out 8 groups for Carex Sp.

1.  One headed 
2.  Hairy 
3.  Large headed 
4.  Beaked bottlebrushed
5.  Beak-less
6.  Female-tipped 
7.  Fox and woodland star
8.  Oval

These are external observations that can be made to lead to you to a certain group.  

Now you begin to break down the plant from the outside in.  Knowledge of the Sedge's structure is vital, and this allows navigation throughout a key to correctly ID the individual.  Each part of the plant listed below will have a distinct characteristic that will differ.  The perigynium is how we identified the difference between the normalis, bebbii, and tenera listed above.  

(http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/articles/sedge)

We found 23 different sedge sp out in the field with Andrew within a four hour time period.  I'm sure if we had more time, we'd find a few more.  Not too many surprises with what we found.  Carex crawfordii was found, which is usually a more northern plant, so that was interesting.  With all the precip we've gotten so far this year, our wetlands are blooming, bursting, and feeling good.


Sunday, May 12, 2013

Thoughts on Establishing a Prairie

Imagine you're looking out onto 3,000 acres of pasture land, and would like to complete a successful prairie restoration.  This will be about a 7 year project to even get close to a fully established prairie that you can feel good about.

Take a walk through the tract of land, and do a thorough inventory.  Seek out any native plants that may be hiding, and stake this area out.  Chances are, if you find a few native plants, there may be more seed beneath the soil.  This could potentially turn into a remnant of previous prairie plants naturally occurring.  

Take the non marked existing land, and spray the vegetation with a non-selective herbicide.  This is done late summer.  

All vegetation you sprayed will be ready to burn after a couple weeks.  The dead vegetation will act as fuel for the fire.  

Burn breaks must be made around the possible remnant areas found to protect these plants as they will still be living when the fire is conducted.  

Once the fire has run through, seeding may commence.  DO NOT throw all of your eggs into one basket... 
Install a cover crop such as Canada Wild Rye.  
This article also states that side-oats grama is another fine cover crop for establishing a prairie: http://www.ag.iastate.edu/farms/06reports/w/NativeCoverCrops.pdf
The article also brings about another point of installing seeds of plants that will establish early in the spring.  This is most notable for stabilizing the soil.  

Remember More disturbance --> More opportunity for invasive/aggressive plants.

As the competition from the previous flora is diminished, and a fire sent through in the fall, the spring will have awakened any seed in the soil looking for a chance to emerge.

This point is exactly why you do not want to put all your eggs in one basket.  With no forbs or fabaceae plants installed, you are given the upper hand to combat anything that emerges unwanted.  Selective herbicides targeting broadleaf plants can be used in mass quantity.  This will not harm your cover crop of rye or side oats, and will dramatically decrease the unwanted plants.

Something to take serious and to watch for on these herbicide labels is the ounce per acre, and how many applications per year you're allowed.  If you're doing this by yourself with smaller equipment, and a little less low tech, this can be challenging.  Luckily there's Ag equipment out there that utilizes GPS to know where to spray.  On a 40' boom sprayer, if the rig crosses over an already sprayed area, the 7' or so of the boom that crossed will automatically shut off.  The rate at which these machines put out is also much more effective and cost efficient that trying to do it yourself with an ATV and 10' boom.

Take a survey of problem areas, and reflect on whether or not the land would be ready for seeding.  You may need another round of fire, and mass herbiciding before installing the rest of the seed in year 3.  Achieving a successful prairie in accordance with time, is most beneficial to rid out the invaders first.  This is getting the heavy lifting out of the way first.  

Let's say you spend year 2 spraying selective herbicides, and decide not to install the prairie seed.  Continue the same process of fire, and selective treatments until you believe you have exhausted the seed pool within the soil.  Once this is accomplished, spray the cover crop again in late summer.  Burn these areas to prep for seed.  Install the prairie seed, and watch it emerge in the following spring.  

Some say you can inter-seed amongst your cover crop, but I'd say just start from scratch again.

Identifying the plants as they come up can be seen as quite challenging as they're seedlings and a lot can look similar.  Yet looking at a chart showing which plants emerge when, will cut down the number of plants substantially from your seed list you installed for identification.  

As a side note to this installation, it is recommended to use a mycorrhizae inoculant with the seed mix.  The science with this gets complex, as this is a difficult relationship to study.  There are many factors that can go into the results.  In essence, it acts as a performance enhancer that bolsters the surrounding soil.  However, I would like to think that this can also feed any invasive plant seeds still within the soil (making them just as adventageous). There is also minor disturbance with the seed drill.  This could provide enough of a window combined with the mycorrhizae to entice the invasives to emerge.  Not to mention all competition has vanished from above ground.  Just something to think about.  We'll save the entire mycorrhizal association with plants for another day.  

With all of that being said, there are numerous ways to go about restoring a prairie.  I believe the learning curve is getting a lot better.  If someone invents sort of a sonar detector (fishing) to inspect the soil before a seeding to determine what seed lies beneath the soil, we'd all be a lot better off.



Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Someone asked me the other day if our prairie was affected by the drought we had this year.  I answered that prairies are built to withstand drought.  That being said, it was a very strange year out there...

That was the last post I started last year.  And also where I'll pick back up.

The year thus far has been going quite well for a prairie manager.  The aggressive growing cool season grass reed canary has come up, but it's been cool enough early to keep all other plants from emerging as fast.  This certainly allows the crew to move a lot faster with a non-selective herbicide to take this grass out, and be more productive.

Three factors stick out when comparing the last spring and this year's spring out at Orland Grasslands:

The first being we burned the fall of 2011.  One of the responses a prairie will have to a burn is emerge earlier the following spring than if we hadn't burned.  After a burn, the ash from plants will drop, snow will fall, and the soil will be exposed to the spring sun.  This prevents reflecting, and warms the soil.  We did not burn in the fall or spring of 2012/2013.

The second factor is quite a simple one.  We had eight 80 degree days in March!  The average last year in March was 63, compared to just 41 degrees this year.

The leisure this provides for a prairie manager is immense.  As previously stated with the cooler temps holding back the native plants, we are able to move a lot faster, and not have to worry about damaging the natives.  Last year seemed like a bomb went off to kick off the growing season, and everything came up at once.

This week has been the first week of noticeable growth across the site.

Blue eyed grass (which is actually not a grass at all, but a part of the Iris family) had just bloomed last week:


Same with Wood Betany this week:


Penstemon and Monardas are shooting up, and the ticks...ohhh the ticks are out in full force as well...

The third factor is also an obvious one.  We recorded the wettest April to date, and it shows.  Carex sp are out in full force feeling great right now.  As evident by this picture (the lime green plants are all sedges):

As to whether or not the prairie was affected by drought or not last year, indeed it was.  The drier areas of the prairie (Mesic) did so-so.  A lot of the plants strained to flower and seed out.  However the wetter areas suffered the most.  Our Marsh and Wet Prairie regions showed poor results.  The wetlands we have dried up, and was replaced by a lot of barnyard grass.  It's just a guessing game on what's in the soil in an area that's been under water for most of its existence! 

And so we begin using our more selective herbicides to combat invasives, and promote growth for the natives.  Happy growing season!